Count Jeremiah

Found Footage Horror Movies

2010-06-12T12:11:00.000-07:00

In the past decade i have seen a small number of horror films that have been shot on a hand held camera. No, these are not some cheap film made in the woods out back by bored teenagers, these actually had a budget from an independent or ever major film studio and actually have a plot behind it. So, why make a movie in such a 'crappy' fashion? We'll talk about that later, first i want to recount my experience as a horror fan in discovering this genre.

The first film i saw made in this manner (and probably the same for most of my generation) is The Blair Witch Project. (earlier Examples include Cannibal Holocaust, Man Bites Dog and even The Last Broadcast the year before. But it was The Blair Witch Project that set the groundwork for future films in this genre. I wasn't too fond of Blair Witch when it first came out, i'm yet to re visit it and give it a proper review but back then it didn't really tickle my fancy. However, there have been films in the genre of late that i have seen over the years and i'll outline them below;

The Zombie Diaries - Documenting a zombie holocaust in the UK, watchable but nothing exciting (6/10)
Diary Of The Dead - George A Romero's take on the found footage genre, think of it as an American version of The Zombie Diaries (7/10)
REC - Spanish film about a News Crew that get trapped in a quarantined apartment block, very suspense filled, plenty of shocks and all around brilliant horror (9/10)
REC 2 - Picks up where the first one left off, where a SWAT team go in to investigate. Story takes some amazing twists (9/10)
Quarantine - American remake of REC, just a typical remake (4/10)
Cloverfield - The Godzilla of the found footage horror genre. 4 friends try to escape Manhattan after a giant monster starts rampaging through the city. Plenty of Action, Suspense and twists. (10/10)
Paranormal Activity

So, now on to why has the genre become so popular despite the use of crappy cinematography? Well, in my opinion the whole hand held camera thing is effective because it feels real, like your looking trough the eyes of the protagonist and you can put yourself in that position. Also, the scariest thing is what you can't see. Say for example, the camera man is walking down a hallway and theres a monster around the corner that he (and therefore you too) can't see, and when it attacks, the fright is extra effective because you didn't expect it.

So, to conclude, while this style of film may not be everybody's cup of tea, it's still a new and fresh idea and i personally look forward to the next film in this genre. This is just an introduction so if you'd like to read further theres a bit more about it as well as a list of films to check out here

The Human Centipede

2010-05-05T17:00:00.000-07:00

The Human Centipede is without a doubt, this generations answer to Cannibal Holocaust. Yes, they are two completely different films, yes, they are virtually unrelated plot wise, etc, etc. So, why did i make that comparison you ask? It is this generations Cannibal Holocaust in the way its gonna divide audiences the world over. This is the sickest, most depraved and shocking movie to pass my viewing station in quite some time, and you really have to see it to believe it.

The film is about two American tourists Lyndsay and Jenny (played by Ashley C. Williams and Ashlynn Yennie) who are on a road trip through Europe. When in the German countryside they end up with a flat tire and go looking for help. They come across a house (Texas Chainsaw Massacre anyone?) which is occupied by a very strange man named Dr. Heiter (played by Dieter Laser), who proceeds to drug the girls and they awake in a makeshift hospital in Heiter basement (hmm? that name rhymes with someone else). When the girls awake there is also a Japaneses tourist named Katsuro (Played by Akihiro Kitamura) in the room with them. (giving the film a Japaneses horror element to it).

Dr. Heiter then unveils his plan to surgical fuse the three together to make a "human centipede", which according to the Trailer is 100% medically accurate. So, that there is the basic plot. A pretty original idea which is what alot of modern horror lacks (with remakes and all that) and it does a very good job of fusing elements of American, European and Japaneses horror very well. People expecting a gorefest are in for a disappointment as theres actually very little.

The character of Dr. Heiter is a good contender for horror icon, very dark, sinister character and is very well played by Laser. The acting of the three victims was well played too, in fact the best i've ever seen. The fear they were feeling felt very real and makes the viewer very uneasy. Some may consider this a horror masterpiece, others may consider it a sick depraved nasty that begs for apocalyptic. Me personally, i liked it and i highly recommend it.

9/10

PS. Apologies for the font changes, can't seem to figure out whats up with it.

Horror Around The World - Japan

2010-04-11T21:05:00.000-07:00

Its a big bad world out there, and alot of countries have some excellent horror movies, so i have decided to start a new article series about countries who have produced some amazing horror. The first country i wanna cover is Japan. Japaneses horror is without a doubt my favorite country for their contribution to the horror genre.

Japaneses horror has seen a huge rise in popularity here in the west, mostly due to the American remakes of such films as Ring, The Grudge, One Missed Call and Dark Water. Naturally i would have seen some of these first due to there mainstream cinema and DVD release here, but over the past while i have been checking out the Japaneses counterparts, and what can i say, they are far superior. Why? I will explain in my own words why i think this is the case.

Although the American versions are good and kudos to the directors for bringing them to the attention of the mainstream eyes, weather people check out the originals or not, entirely up to you, but i would recommend you check out Japaneses horrors (and any foreign horror for that matter) because the first thing that makes them better is the fact that its a culture and language which is alien to you, which i honestly believe adds to the suspense and feeling of unease that you want to feel when watching a horror movie.

Japaneses horror are also just so well written, full of suspense and plot twists that are so well put together. Once you watch one, you want more. Ones i would highly recommend are as follows;

Ring (Ringu)
One Missed Call
Parasite Eve
The Grudge

Their just the usual suspects, loads more flying about. However, Japan is not just the home of some of the scariest horror, it is also the home of some of the most sick, depraved and goriest movies i have ever seen (people who fainted watching Saw or Hostel, you'll die when you see whats in store here).

Perhaps the most notorious of all these movies is the second movie in the Guinea Pig film series 'The Flower Of Flesh and Blood", for a short film it is so graphic and real looking that when it was released in the USA, and Hollywood Actor Charlie Sheen saw it, he thought it was a genuine snuff film and reported it to the FBI. The Director Hideshi Hino even marketed it as a submission from a crazed fan as a joke (a making of documentary was made to clear up any claims of it being a snuff film).

This and the other films in the Guinea Pig series i would recommend to any of the gore hungry out there, as well as the following;

Tokyo Gore Police
The Machine Girl
Naked Blood
Grotesque (refused certification in the UK)
Evil Dead Trap
Ichi The Killer
Battle Royal

To finish it off, i will talk about Japan most popular export, Anime. There is lots of good horror themed anime out there, including Hellsing and Blood: The Last Vampire, both very good watches. Can't think of any more as i'm not much of an expert on anime (friend of mine is educating me though). On the more sick and depraved side of things i would recommend Devil Man and the always delightful Urotsukidōji (found that entertaining due to my sick sense of humor, others may be offended by it). But yea, that is all i have to say about Japan's horror market, do check out what i recommended and i hope you find this to be a good resource, because i had alot of fun writing this article. Sayonara

Paranormal Entity

2010-02-23T18:27:00.000-08:00

Alright, back to horror now. This time i'm gonna do a short review of a movie from 'The Asylum'. For those of you who don't know who they are, they are a studio who make direct to DVD b-movies for chains like Blockbuster (Here in Ireland we would find these movies in the bargain bin of some video stores). They usually are complete rip offs of major releases that would be in the cinema at the time, for example, Snakes on a Train, Transmorphers, Pirates of Treasure Island, and so on and so on. Point is, there lame rip offs and don't really do a good job of hiding what movie they're ripping off, hense why they're called 'mockbusters' by people in the industry. There is the odd one that would have the same idea as its High grossing, a list counterpart, but have some degree of originality, and heres an example.

Paranormal Entity (in case you haven't copped it, its another take of Paranormal Activity, review of that is down below) tells the story of a family who have lost their father/husband in a tragic accident. The mother tries to communicate with him, and claims to get a response from him from beyond the grave, but after a series of strange occurrences in the house they start to think otherwise. The son, who's name is Thomas, starts to put camera around the house to document the occurrence's. Thats the basic plot, near enough the same scenario as Paranormal Activity, shot the same way, but does add a few new twists so if your looking for an alternative to Paranormal Activity, then this i would recommend, watch alone in your room in pitch blackness to get its full effect, its just as scary, if not more. In this one its the sister (Sam) and mother (Cindy) who are getting attacked by the demon, so its double the shocks.

7/10

Batman: Mask of the Phantasm

2010-02-23T16:26:00.000-08:00

Batman: Mask of the Phantasm is the feature length animation from 1993, and in my opinion a very underrated nostalgic classic. The Batman Animated series was very popular at the time yet back then i never heard anyone speak of this movie, so back then i just assumed it wasn't great. Checked it out yesterday and i have to say i was most impressed.

The plot revolves around an old love interest of Bruce Wayne (voiced by Kevin Conroy) by the name of Andrea Beaumont (voiced by Dana Delany) who unexpectedly arrives back in Gotham City. Meanwhile an unknown masked assassin (you can guess its The Phantasm judging by the title) is picking off Gothams gangsters one by one. Due to it having a cape, city councilman Aurthur Reeves (voiced by Hart Bochner) has wrongfully accused The Caped Crusader of the murders and has therefore called a for a manhunt. Its up to Bruce Wayne (Batman) to get to the bottom of this and clear his name.

The plot is full of flashbacks and twists which is what makes it such a good story, so i will stop here. I will say that The Joker (Voiced by the incredible Mark Hamill) makes an appearance later on in the movie. The story is very well written, the animation is in that distinctive batman style, really dark. The voice acting is flawless and i am just speechless that this movie hasn't got the attention it deserves. It no Dark Knight but if your like me (ie, seen Dark Knight way too much) this makes for a perfect alternative. Highly recommended.

8/10

Star Trek (2009)

2010-02-13T12:55:00.000-08:00

Star Trek, the biggest cult television and movie series of all time, spawned an original TV series, 11 movies and 4 other TV shows set in the same universe but depicting different characters on a different adventure. 2009 saw a movie reboot with the character of the original series but played by different actors. Myself personally, i'm not the biggest 'Trekie' in the world, but i did enjoy the show. So i had my doubts about this reboot, didn't think new young actors would do the series any justice. I was proven wrong.

It was just amazing, so amazing that i find it very hard to describe. Its basically a prequel, telling the story of how the crew of the USS Enterprise all met, before James T Kirk (played by Chris Pine) became captain. All the classic characters are there including Spock (played by Zachary Quinto), Scotty (Played by Simon Pegg) and Uhura (played by Zoe Saldana). All of them gave top notch performances and did the classic characters alot of justice.

The only complaint i have is the character of Dr. Leonerd McCoy (played by Karl Urban), he kept it true to the original character but at times it felt kinda forced and over acted. Then again i haven't seen the original series in years so my memory may be a little rusty. Won't go into too much detail about the plot but i will say the villain in this one is a Romulan named Captain Nero (played by Eirc Bana) who is a time traveler, which sets the film in an alternative reality, which is very hard to explain but still makes sense when you watch it, in a way (after all, it is Star Trek), the only spoiler i will give you is that Leonard Nimoy makes an appearance as Spock from the future. So weather you a fan of Star Trek or not, this is worth checking out. Its action packed from start to finish as well as having an amazing plot and visuals.

9/10

Super Mario Bros

2010-02-09T06:41:00.000-08:00

Ok, now to go away from horror for a bit and take a trip back to the past. To the very first major motion picture to be based off a video game. You don't have to be a hardcore gamer to know who the Super Mario Bros are. Mario was everywhere for most of the 80's and 90's and in fact is still a pop culture icon to this day. But lets go back to 1993, i was six years old and i remember my older brother getting a Nintendo Entertainment System for one of his birthday's (not sure which one), and Mario was one of the games he got. I spent almost every waking hour playing that game, i just loved it. Then i see a trailer for a Super Mario Bros movie, and i so excited. By then we had also got the second and third one and i was also spending every waking hour playing it, but enough about my past and on to the movie review.

As a kid i remember watching it when it came out on video because i couldn't see it in the cinema due to it being certified 12 (i think), that's just to the best of my memory. But i remember watching it once, not really getting it and then never seeing it again until just recently. Sense its release it was a flop at the box office and got alot of negative reviews from critics, but has maintained a cult following. Why was it a flop and why did i not really get it as a kid? Well, the directors took a major risk by making it nothing like the games at all (bar a couple of reference's here and there), is it a bad thing? Well, not really if you just look outside the box.

Mario (Played by Bob Hoskins) and Luigi (Played by John Leguizamo) are Italian plumbers (one thing they got right) living in Brooklyn, New York. They meet this orphaned girl named Daisy who is digging for Dinosauer bones. When they go to check it out they find a portal to another dimension which is not the mushroom kingdom from the games, but a dystopian society (kinda like Blade Runner or Judge Dredd) run by Bowser, or King Koopa (played by Dennis Hopper). Another departure from the video game is rather than make Bowser just a lizard he is a humanoid descendant of the Tyrannosaurus Rex. Another character that is depicted differently from the games is Toad (you know, that annoying ass wipe who you always conveniently meet at the end of each castle to tell you our princess is in another castle). Instead of being a mushroom headed kid, in the movie he is a friendly street musician with a Texas accent who meets Mario and Luigi on the street.

Not to give too much of the plot away, i will give this movie the fair review it deserves. The costumes first of all are great, especially when Mario and Luigi put on their trademark red and green suits, complete with hats and these really silly but strangely awesome jumper boots. The Goomba's look nothing like they do in the game and are a bit silly, but their suits are great, kinda like a military uniform and punk rock hybrid. In fact, despite the movie being a flop, it was nominated for a Saturn award in 1994 for best costume and best make up.

Alot of critics slated it for being too dark and not child friendly, which i do agree, making a movie based on a Nintendo game, children are going to be you target audience. Critics also said there is no reference's to the games at all, which i full on disagree with. They are there, you just have to find them. Examples include the giant fungus helping Mario and Luigi throughout their journey, well thats a reference to the mushroom power ups in the game. You can also hear sounds from the game in some scenes. And the characters from the game are all there, including Yoshi, who's a very Jurassic Park esque baby T-Rex (Jurassic Park being released 3 years previous). Other game references include the Bob-omb and the names of several characters and villains on street signs.

So yea, not to drag on any more i will conclude by saying, this movie is a guilty pleasure of mine and its worth checking out or revisiting either for some cheesy fun or just for nostalgia value. As it is the first major motion picture to be based off a video game, its worth checking out, because its not the worst. There has been worse video game to movie adaptations (Uwe Boll anyone?), and hey, they just started to get comic book movie adaptations right, maybe they will get video games right in time. But until then, ignore what the critics are saying and check out this movie, because despite it being very little to do with the game, its actually a pretty good science fiction fantasy adventure movie.

7/10

Texas Chainsaw Massacre (series)

2010-02-03T21:00:00.000-08:00

Its that time again, time to review not just one, but an entire series of horror movies. And any fan of horror has heard of the infamous Texas Chainsaw Massacre. The first film was directed by Tobe Hooper and released in 1974, and later spawned 3 sequels, a remake, a prequel as well as a video game and comic books. The first film is loosely based on the real life serial killer Ed Gein (read about him here.).

The first one tells the story of four teenagers on a road trip who break down on a Texas back road. On their search for help they meet alot of strange characters and later find a house inhabited by a family of demented cannibals, one of them being horror icon Leatherface (played by Gunnar Hansen). They are now on a fight for survival that no one could ever imagine. Despite the name, this first instalment is not the gore fest you'd expect, yet its dark atmosphere, unsettling musical score and high suspense make it the perfect horror movie. This film made it onto the video nasties list and remained banned in the UK until 2000. In 1982 a video game was made for the Atari (see Angry Video Game Nerd tear it apart here.).

1986 saw a long awaited sequel, simply called Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2, which despite picking up where the last film left off, this one had a more over the top black comedy style about it, and also was very gore heavy. This one introduced Chop Top (played by Bill Moseley) who is just simply awesome, a very demented but strangely very likable character. This movie was a flop at the box office but has developed a cult following among horror fan and i highly recommend checking this out, because its the last one to be directed by Tobe Hooper and the last of the good Texas Chainsaw Massacre films of that generation.

The 90's saw two god awful abominations that bared the tag of Texas Chainsaw Massacre. In 1990 we saw the release of Leatherface:Texas Chainsaw Massacre 3, which stared Viggo Mortensen (of Lord of the Rings fame) and was going to be the first in a line of sequels by New Line Cinema, but due to its lack of success New Line stoped any involvement in the franchise. All in all its not the worst, its still watchable but doesn't give us anything new, nothing about leatherfaces past, no twists, no silly black humour, just a generic sequel really, yet still worth the watch if your stuck.

Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Next Generation from 1994 on the other hand, those who are easily offended, stop reading now because i'm about to tear this one apart in ways only a foul mouth can. This movie is a piece of shit covered in more shit and dipped in puke and sprinkled with dried horses semen. Yes, you heard me, avoid this like the plague. I would not force my worst enemy to watch this. it is so bad. It is pretty much a bad remake as alot of scenes are similar but its just boring the whole way trough. The film doesn't feature one chainsaw murder at all, so why 'chainsaw' is in the title is beyond me, and they made Leatherface into a cross dresser, like WHY??????? Just do what i do and pretend this movie didn't happen.

A remake of the original was then made in 2003, three years after the original was released uncut on DVD in the UK. Generally i have a great dislike for remakes but this was one of of only 2 i like. It was pretty much the same as the original but some things were changed, like at the beginning it showed stock video footage of a police officer exploring the Leatherface house and the film also dwelt in the origin of Leatherface. Its also alot darker and has the same, if not better suspense and terrifying scenes.

This remake was such a success that the same people later released not a remake of the sequel but a prequel. Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning was released in 2006 and i just loved it. They painted Leatherfaces past and how his family became poor and became demented cannibals perfectly, it is just an under rated masterpiece. It pretty much ties up all the loose ends and i highly recommend it. So to finish it off, the first two Texas Chainsaw Massacre are horror classics, the 90's saw two bad sequels and the 21st century gave it the reboot that it needed. While doing research for this review i saw that Tobe Hooper is planning a Texas Chainsaw Massacre 3D, which i can't wait for, but until then, i'll leave you with my rating's.

Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974) 10/10
Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 9/10
Leatherface: Texas Chainsaw Massacre 3 3/10
Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Next Generation (didn't happen)
Texas Chainsaw Massacre Remake 8/10
Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning 9/10

Snuff

2010-02-03T13:44:00.000-08:00

Time for another return to the infamous video nasties, and this time one that should have been forgotten. Snuff, the infamous 1976 slasher flick directed by Michael and Roberta Findlay. This is probably gonna be my shortest review ever because there is really not alot you can say about this movie. It was filmed in Argentina and follows a Manson family type group of hippys going on a killing spree.

The killing scenes are very fake looking, the blood is obviously strawberry paste and the film in general is just extremely boring. How did this piece of shit get its place in history? Get this, the directors knew they made a shitty movie so they put a scene in at the end where it shows behind the scenes and the director proceeds to kill one of the actresses very brutally (faked of course), they decided to call the movie Snuff, market it as an actual snuff movie, got people to protest outside cinemas and low and behold, the piece of shit gets all the coverage it needs.

But what surprises me is, how did people believe it was real? Its clearly strawberry syrup. How stupid you must be to buy it? i dunno, i wasn't around back then but.....would the bad acting of the people being killed not be a dead giveaway? i dunno. I rate this movie...

-10/10 (yea, that's right, i can use negative numbers in my reviews)

Now go watch your dog take a shit in the garden, because believe me, its way more entertaining than this movie.

Twilight

2010-02-03T12:27:00.000-08:00

Twilight is the 2008 vampire movie based on the saga of novels by Stephenie Meyer. I haven't read the books so keep this in mind throughout this review. I decided to check out the films due to the very mixed reviews from the general public that i've observed. As well as having a huge fan base there is also a massive 'anti-fan' base (childish and stupid i know, but what can you do), And of course i just adore vampire movies.

My own opinion on this movie is fairly neutral. I would be somewhere between the group of people who love it so much and the rest who hate it with a passion. It had some aspects that i likes and other aspects that i hated. As i said i haven't read the books but i do assume they would be better, as i'm sure some of you would know, Hollywood is notorious for either completely messing up or just doing okay when making adaptions of novels, comic books, etc. (some similarities to this and Lord Of The Rings, the ones who read the books and saw the movies loved them, the ones who saw the movies but didn't read the books either enjoyed it, hated it or just didn't get it, just an observation)

I'll start with the things i liked. First of all, it does have a fairly interesting story (which could have been told better) and the visuals are pretty impressive (such as the forest, atmosphere, action and fighting scenes). The characters are pretty good, but the acting on some could have been alot better (the main characters of Bella Swan and Edward Cullen i did not find convincing at all, which is pretty bad for main characters, most of the scenes with them felt like i was watching a bad soap opera) i really liked the characters of Dr. Carlisle Cullen (played by Peter Facinelli) who is the towns physician and father figure of the Cullen family (who are vampires in case you don't know). The Nomadic Vampires were just deadly in my opinion and once they go on the hunt for Bella is when the film gets interesting (they also make appearances early on).

The things i disliked about the film now, and i may have said this earlier, but for the most part its like a feature length American teen soap opera like One Tree Hill or something similar, only with vampires put in to make it more watchable or something. And the fact that the vampires sparkle like diamonds in the sunlight i thought was just laughable (like, come on). To be fair though, maybe it was just another take on Vampire fiction, but it just didn't do it for me.

All around, it had an interesting story and interesting characters, but it could have been directed and acted a bit better, maybe the books are better as i said already. Some scenes are pretty funny (like the baseball scene) but all around its just somewhat decent. Not a masterpiece but also not the worst movie in the world.

5/10

The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari

2010-01-18T13:39:00.000-08:00

Now to take a step back in time, much further than usual to be precise. To the era of silent cinema. Silent movies are often ignored by my generation, whats the point sure? We have movies with talking and in colour as well. let the past be the past. Not really, to understand the present you must appreciate the past. And as a die hard horror fan, there is two silent movies that are an important part of the history of horror. These were The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari from 1920 and Nosferatu from 1922.

The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari is a German expressionist film. The plot i find a bit difficult to explain as with most silent films so do bear with me. Its set in the German mountain village of Holstenwal and tells the story of a deranged Dr. Caligari and his sleepwalking sidekick named Cesare (who he keeps in a cabinet) who are connected to a series of murders in the town. Its told in flashback form. That's just putting it very bluntly.

Visually, this film looks like something out of a dream, really far out and trippy for its time. Really tall doors and windows that are bent in really weird ways and accompanied by a very haunting soundtrack. Silent movies relied heavily on the music to keep you drawn into the story and this is a very good example.

Gonna cut this review short as i know very little about silent movies to give any real insight into this but i will say, if your a fan of horror, its worth checking out as its one of the first horror movies and very good for its time.

8/10

The Last House on the Left (1972)

2010-01-17T12:52:00.000-08:00

To avoid fainting, keep repeating, its only a movie. This is the best description to Wes Cravens 1972 debut, The Last House On The Left. Now available on DVD in its fully uncut glory. What can i say about this movie that hasn't been said already? For a film that caused such uproar upon it release, it was also a film that set the groundwork for future slasher flicks.

As you may have seen in my Cannibal Holocaust review, i spoke of an era known as the video nasties, which took place in the UK in the early 80's. This film made that list as it was refused cinema release in the UK in the 70's, but then the home video boom of the 1980's made it possible to be released in the UK, among others. This lead to the founding of the Obscene Publications Act. The film remained banned for the remainder of the 80's and 90's and only got an uncut release in 2008, and the following year a remake was made.

Mari Collingwood is off to celebrate her 17th birthday with her friend Phyllis Stone by attending a rock concert in the big city. Mari's parents show some concern at the band shes going to see and her friendship with Phyllis, but still allow her to go. Meanwhile, four violent criminals have escaped from prison. While in the city, Mari and Phyllis try to score drugs and happen to meet the criminals and ask them. The criminals then kidnap the two girls and head out to the country, where they run out of gas, ironically, near Mari's house. The horror begins when the criminals proceed to beat, rape, humiliate and eventually, and very violently kill the two young girls. After they clean up, they look for refuge in none other than Mari's parents house, and eventually the parents find out what they did and they enact a very brutal revenge.

The monsters in this movie are not Vampires, Werewolves or Zombies, but the monster within some people, in this case the criminals, and the monster that can be created when these monsters hurt a loved one, in this case the parents. This was the first time anyone dared to tackle this issue (To my knowledge) in a horror movie. The very low budget and grainy production values add to the already dark plot of the film (Some comic relief is provided in the vein of the police officers, who are very funny).

As nasty as The Last House on the Left was, it really spoke of the period of American history in which it was made. The late 60's and early 70's saw alot of darkness in the vein of The death of the flower generation, the vietnam war and the tragedy at Jackson and Kent state. It came out at a time when America was waking up to the real life horror that was in everyone's back yard. That is what makes a good horror movie, when you dwell in the fear of a society. And this movie is a very good example. highly recommended.

9/10

P.S. Look out for a review of the remake in the future.

Avatar

2010-01-16T07:43:00.000-08:00

Avatar, the must see film of 2009? Yes, it does add to the hype if not more. Visually its just specular and the storyline is nothing short of gripping, and its even more amazing in 3D. The story is set in the year 2154 and the human race have stripped earth of all its natural resources and is on a mining operation on the moon of planet Polyphemus called Pandora, which is occupied by Na'vi, blue skinned humanoids with feline characteristics and bear resemblance to the native Indians. (in fact, Was Studi of Dances with Wolves and The last Of the Mohican's fame plays the leader of the tribe). In an attempt to communicate with the Na'vi, scientists grow Na'vi bodies modified with human DNA called Avatars.

Jake Sully (played by Sam Worthington) is a paraplegic former marine who must replace his murdered twin brother in the Avatar program, headed by Dr. Grace Augustine (played by Sigourney Weaver). Once he gets control of the Avatar he starts to get a bit cocky, which you can't blame him for as he now has the ability to walk again. However, it does cause him to get lost on his first mission. He then get rescued by Neytiri (played by Zoe Saldana) who brings him back to the village, here he starts to learn about Na'vi culture and soon become accepted by them. However, when hes not in Avatar form he is forced to make deals with Colonel Miles Quaritch (Stephen Lang) and this does start to cause problems.

Storyline is very complex so i don't want to give too much away. I do have alot to say about it. Is it original? No. But really, what is original theses days (as myself and my friend were saying, he did a video review, check it here -

It does borrow themes from other movies like Dances With Wolves (the theme of learning new cultures and personal journey's), Fern Gully: The Last Rainforest (the theme of environmental issues), Pocahontas (love theme) and the visuals are very Final Fantasy inspired. This is not a bad thing at all, James Cameron did an amazing job of of mixing these themes together.

Another theme that i've seen alot of in recent Science Fiction films (District 9 for example) is the concept of the aliens being portrayed as the victims rather than the invaders or 'baddies' to put it bluntly. In this the humans (especially the Military) are portrayed as heartless and greedy, the best example being Colonel Miles Quaritch. I really like this theme as it portrays humans more realistically. However, there is a message in there that there is still good out there.

To finish off, The characters are likeable (well, some), the story is very inspiring and the Jungle and its Flora and Fauna is amazing. Avatar is not just watchable, but also very re watchable and once the credits roll you are left with an amazing feeling that i can't even describe. Go see it.

10/10

The Exorcism of Emily Rose

2010-01-09T06:14:00.000-08:00

For my next review i'm going to talk about the often overlook (well now) demonic horror movie of 2005 called The Exorcism of Emily Rose. When i say overlooked i mean when i'm in decisions weather it be online or with real people about horror movies, The Exorcist is always discussed when it comes to the theme of demonic possession. And sure, the Exorcist is a classic but i wouldn't list it as one of my favourites. Why? Well, i thought is was over hyped. People saying it was the scariest movie in the world, i disagreed. Had more black comedy than horror. but anyway, i'll talk about it in another review and get on with this one.

The Exorcism of Emily Rose is based on true events (loosely based on the story of Anneliese Michel). Father Richard Moore (played by Tom Wilkinson) is on trial for the murder of Emily Rose (played by Jennifer Carpenter) who was a devout catholic girl who was possessed by demons. The movie is done court room drama style, kinda like a very long episode of Law and Order. But don't let it put you off. Trough the witnesses testimonies we watch flashbacks of the possession and exorcism, which are very terrifying. And scary scenes and suspense are not just in the flashbacks, as Erin Bruner, Father Moores lawyer (played by Laure Linney) is also staked by the very demons who possessed Emily.

I'll conclude with, first why the review is so short. Well, the film does go into some very interesting topics which i find a little hard to explain, so your going to have to watch it, plus i find that i put a few spoilers in my reviews so i won't go into the plot of this one too much. It is very suspense filled, very scary, very good plot twists and character development and more importantly no black humour which makes it easier to take seriously (don't get me wrong, i do love black humour) So if your looking for an alternative to The Exorcist, i highly recommend this one.

8/10

Halloween Series

2010-01-08T22:11:00.000-08:00

Now to review not just one but an entire series of horror movies. Halloween started as a low budget slasher movie in 1978 by horror master John Carpenter, and over the years has become a Franchise which includes sequels, Comic Books, Novels and Action Figures. Of course it also brought horror icon Michael Myers into the world. But i'm only here to talk about the movies so lets get on with it shall we.

The first Halloween was released in 1978 and tells the story of a little boy named Michael Myers from Haddonfield, Illinois, who on Halloween night 1963 stabbed his sister Judith to death. He was then committed to Smiths Grove Sanitarium under the care of Dr. Sam Lommis (played by Donald Pleasence). After his many failed attempts to reach Michael he just gives up as all he can see is evil in his eyes. Michael is also mute which made attempts to reach him very difficult.

After 15 years of being locked up in Smiths Grove, Michael escapes. Dr. Lommis goes on the trail of the crazed killer, who is returning home to Haddonfield to kill again. after that were introduced to Laurie Strode (played by Jamie Lee Curtus) who is a high school student and babysitter of Tommy Doyle, who always asks Laurie about the Bogey man and does he exist. Throughout the day she is staked by Michael and meanwhile Dr. Lommis is running around haddonfield looking for Michael. Than night the killings start and Dr. Loomis finds him just as he's about to kill Laurie and shoots him just in the nick of time, but looks out the window to see that hes gone. So yea, i kept that a bit blunt because it is a classic and i'm sure you know the story by now. Just gonna say that the suspense is amazing and the build up will have you on the edge of your seat.

Halloween 2 is a direct continuation of the first one and was released in 1981. Laurie is taken to hospital and Dr. Lommis continues on his wild goose chase. Here we learn that Laurie is actually Michael's sister and thats the reason he went after her. This instalment had more blood and gore than its predecessor but is still as amazing and suspense filled.

Halloween 3 is one that i'm yet to see. I know its the only entry in the series to not have Michael Myers and i've heard mixed reviews. i will write a review of it once i see it. One fact i will tell you is they planed on making the Halloween movies all different, like a Halloween story for every year but this was a flop at the box office so in 1988 we see Michael Myers return in Halloween 4, entitled The Return Of Michael Myers. This one shows Michael return from a 10 year coma after his 1978 killing spree of the first two movies. He learns that Laurie Strode is Dead but also that she has a daughter Jamie, so he returns to Haddonfield to kill her. Dr. Lommis also makes a return in this one to stop Michael.

Halloween 5 is perhaps the weakest entry in the series, but i actually enjoyed it as it introduced this mysterious man in black and the curse of thorn symbol, and it shows Jamie has a sort of teleaphatic bond with Michael. Still worth checking out.

The next instalment Halloween 6 or just Halloween: The Curse of Michael Myers is just amazing, perhaps in my opinion, the most underrated horror movie ever. It goes into the curse of thorn symbolism and how its the source of Michaels evil. Also Tommy Doyle, the boy being babysat by Laurie Strode in the Original makes a return and is played by Paul Rudd. There is two cuts of this movie and i would highly recommend the producers cut as it goes into the Thorn Symbol and reveals who the mysterious man in black is, you can find it online or get bootleg copies on ebay. I highly recommend it. This is also the last movie to star Donald Pleasence as he passed away shortly after its release. May he rest in peace.

Halloween H20 is set 20 years after the events of Halloween 2 and sees Laurie Strode return. She is living in California under a new name and has a career and a son but is still haunted by the events 20 years ago. Michael Myers has found her file and knows of her location and is now returning to finish her off. All in all, its not a bad movie, but not a masterpiece. Also the curse of thorn sub-plot is completely ignored. Weak in places but still watchable.

Halloween Resurrection? hmm? not great. but if your looking for some cheesy fun, i'd recommend it. Starts off great as Michael finally finishes Laurie Strode, but after that it just gets silly and trys to appeal to the MTV generation. One scene really stands out, Busta Rhymes dressed as Michael Myers shouting at the real Michael Myers. Watch it for that scene alone, its hilarious.

After that i sort of lost interest in the Halloween Series. Then in 2007 a remake was made. heard about it and ignored it. then i realised who made it, Rob Zombie. I am a huge fan of his music and i heard of his exploition horror movies House of a 1000 corpses and devils rejects (which i've seen sense), so i thought i'd check it out. and yes, it was awesome. he made both a prequel and a remake, and made it in his own style. The way he painted Michael's childhood is just spectacular and disturbing. And Malcom McDowell did the character of Sam Lommis alot of justice. Alot of people complained about it but i say it was a different take on the Halloween story and deserves respect. Not alot of suspense which made the first one good but the shocking scenes are amazing.

Rob Zombie also made a sequel to the remake which was a flop and got alot of negative reviews from critics and fans alike. But me, i actually didn't think it was that bad. Its all over the place though, i will say that. Like he tried to squeeze elements of all the Halloween sequels into one, and made Dr. Lommis a money mad author rather than pursue Michael. But despite these flaws its still watchable and has a couple of cheap laughs. Not amazing but not bad either.

So in conclusion, Halloween is without a doubt one of the greatest horror franchises ever. To start as a low budget slasher flick to a series of sequels that spanned three decades is quite a success story and Michael Myers is a household name among horror fans and it set the ground work for all future slasher flicks.

Halloween 10/10
Halloween 2 9/10
Halloween 3 (haven't seen)
Halloween 4 9/10
Halloween 5 6/10
Halloween 6 10/10
Halloween H20 6/10
Halloween Resurrection 4/10
Rob Zombies Halloween 9/10
Rob Zombies Halloween 2 5/10

Paranormial Activity

2010-01-06T09:47:00.000-08:00

Now for a more recent film. Was hearing alot about Paranormal Activity trough word of mouth, some saying it was good, others saying it was bad, you know, the usual crap. One description i heard from someone had me a bit spatial at first was 'Big Brother on the big screen'. If you don't know me, i despise Big Brother alot. But i thought i'd check it out as really, when it comes to movies you shouldn't trust the opinions of others, you should make up your own mind.

So yea, enough life lessons and on to the review. Paranormal Activity was made in 2007 by director Oren Peli. It spent 2 years on the film festival circuit before it got a nationwide cinema release this year. The story centres around a young couple called Katie and Micah, who have just moved in together. After a couple of strange occurrences, Micah decides to document everything on video.

They consult a Psychic who sits and talks with them. Here is where we learn about Katies past, and the Psychic tells them its a demon who follows Katie, and that they should consult a deamonoligist as the psychic can only deal with ghosts. All he knows is that demons feed of negative energy. Micah tells Katie not to call the demonoligest.

Micah is without a doubt the stupidest character i have ever seen in any horror movie. I mean, to be fair, i know he wants to protect his girlfriend and getting an outsider to fix their problems makes him uncomfortable, okay fair enough, almost every man is like that. But the fact that he trys to communicate with the demon trough an Ouija board, ignoring his girlfriends pleas to turn off the camera and making her angry, hmm? Remember the whole demon feeds of negative energy thing? And yes, because of Micah's arrogance things only get worse.

Don't want to give too much away so i'll conclude with this. The scenes while there sleeping and the haunting occur are very terrifying, mostly you have to deal with boring dialogue scenes and silly soap opera drama, but the shocks do get you when you least expect it and its very suspense filled. so all in all, not a bad horror movie at all.

7/10

Cannibal Holocaust

2010-01-05T05:01:00.000-08:00

The early 1980's, an exciting time. Home video was a new thing and small video companies could release unknown directors work without a theatrical release. This caused panic when it came to horror movies and the obscene publications act was put into place. This marked the era known as the video nasties.

Now, i wasn't around at the time, but i was able to see most of the films on the list. So not to bore you with a history lesson, one movie that caused the most controversy was Cannibal Holocaust. Italian director Ruggero Deodato unleashed this monster of a movie in 1980 to a unsuspecting public. Okay, gore movies have been around as early as the 1960's with Blood Feast being the first, but no one was ready for this gem.

The story starts in new york, with a news report about cannibal tribes in the amazon, and about four student documentary film makers who went missing there. Harold Monroe (played by Robert Kerman) is a famous anthropologist who embarks on an rescue mission. There he witnesses the most unimaginable horror any human could ever experience as he witnesses first hand the rituals of the very primitive tribes.

He then learns of the deaths of the four film makers but retrieves the footage and brings it back to new york. But the horror is just about to begin, as the footage he and his collages are about to see will go beyond their wildest nightmares. The rest of the film is that footage shot Blare Witch Esq (or more likely, Blare Witch completely ripped it off).

Upon its release, director Ruggero Deodato was brought to court accused of making a snuff film. Which he was cleared of as he payed the actors to disappear for awhile once the film was made. However, the scenes of animal deaths were real and were removed from most versions of the movie ( i watched the full uncut version online, and believe me, those scenes are nasty). The most famous scene in the film is the scene where a women is impaled, it looked so real that people at the time thought it was, and Deodato had to get the actress to testify.

So in conclusion, despite being a fan of gore movies myself, i found this movie to be a very rough watch, but still a very good watch at the same time. It makes you question how civilised we are in the Western world and shows how savage in nature the human race really is. Cannibal Holocaust, highly recommended, but you were warned.

9/10

Clerks

2010-01-05T03:22:00.000-08:00

This here is my first review, so i thought I'd start with my favourite movie ever. That movie is Clerks. Kevin Smith's 1994 debut. The story revolves around a man called Dante Hicks (played by Brian O'Halloran) and his best friend/worst enemy Randall Graves (Played By Jeff Anderson). Dantie works in a small connivance store and Randal works in a video rental store next door. It is also the debut movie of cult classic duo Jay and Silent Bob (Jason Mewes and Kevin Smith) who are two wasters who just hang around the store playing music, selling drugs and fooling about.

So what is it that's so enjoyable about this movie? well, you can relate to the characters so well. Kevin Smith brilliantly mixes comedy with drama. Anybody who is in their mid twenties or younger or older can relate to them. Dantie first of all, is your typical stuck in a dead end job mess of a man. Always complains about his situation yet lacks the enthusiasm to change. He also makes a lot of bad decisions and digs himself a deeper hole, in romance for example.

Randal on the other hand, is the opposite. Hes shows up to work late, spends most of work dossing and being rude to the customers and is always getting Dantie into trouble. Hes your typical asshole who has a quality about him that you like, at least according to Dantie. That explains my best friend/worst enemy comment i mentioned above.

Jay and Silent Bob are just classic. Your typical wasters that every town has. They spend their day hanging around the block of stores, making money by selling drugs yet still shoplift when Dantie's back is turned. Jay is the foul mouthed yob and Silent Bob is, well, the quiet one. In this film and in future ones bob would have one piece of dialogue, usually near the end, and its usually a piece of good advice.

The film also have a few small characters such as strange (or just your typical annoying) customer, which adds to the appeal of the film. Anyone who has worked in retail can relate to it. Also old school friends who would make fun of Dantie or Randell because of where they work at their age.

Another thing i love about the film is the references to popular culture it makes. Scenes where Dantie and Randall are talking and in other scenes, they make references to Star Wars (alot), Jaws, etc, And despite the low budget, being in black and white and the deadly risk Smith took in making this movie (maxed out 8 to 10 credit cards to get the money together) the movie is still watchable and re watchable, and the Clerks legacy lives on. There is comic books, and short lived animated series, a sequel and talk of another sequel. This movie is in simple terms, a classic.

10/10